Are you collecting or creating?
Article
Paul Gallagher
To many, being a camera club or photographic society member or being able to say that a particular club is ‘their’ club is harnessing a sense of belonging and community. There is, of course, nothing wrong with this, and many photographers indeed look forward to club night and the events that bring everyone together. There is a comfortable familiarity to the place and the other members that become friends.
In many ways, this extends to many activities in life, from golf to book clubs, from gyms to social clubs. In fact, the UK boasts one of the highest densities of clubs and societies in the world, so surely this should be healthy for photography? Not necessarily so from our experiences.
Firstly, not all clubs are the same. Some are welcoming places where help is always at hand, and new or less experienced members are encouraged to progress by the offer of help. Some clubs have splinter groups that nurture certain skills in wildlife, street and portraiture, accommodating differing interests, making membership even more rewarding.
Trophies and awards are an integral part of camera club life, and along with the politics of these, this is where club life can act as a disincentive as well as a handicap for the photographer seeking to evolve. As with all competitions, there are rules. Boundaries are in place which can range from specific subject matter to whether the image can be only black and white. We have heard stories of trees that have to be presented in an image in odd numbers, and woe betide you if you have four or six in a row. The sunrise and sunset trends are often exhausted, not to mention the terrors of not placing the main subject on ‘the third’! When it comes to an impending competition, understandably, individuals have their own interests that come first, namely winning!
Then there are the people who decide the outcome of the competitions, the judges. If there was ever one common theme that was present in any account of club competitions, it would be the disdain for the judges delivering the scores. For the winners, things are fine, and they soon look forward to the next in the hope of reaping more awards. For the losers, the experience seems to act as a huge disincentive to continue with their photography, or even worse, discontinue membership, which is what I have seen many times over the years.
When competitions become a dominant part of camera club environments, members are pitched against each other and not only is bitterness felt towards the judges, but also towards the fellow members that seem to consistently win. Even worse are the tactics put in place to achieve a win. It is commonly heard that members will understand what types of images serve to please a particular judge, and they will actively enter images of this genre or type in the hope that they will have an advantage.
When all of these factors come together, support for others to progress and friendship with fellow members begins to dwindle, and the experience of being there is fraught with negativity. By bringing people together with a common passion, it should be presumed that the gathering of photographic love would be shared and promoted, but if that is largely replaced by competitive motives, how can this nurture individuality and creativity?
As with any art form, freedom of expression is its very lifeblood, yet a strong competition culture can suppress this, often embraced by their members in the pursuit of winning awards. The most expressive and impressive photographs ever made were borne of photographers who followed their hearts as opposed to harbouring concerns about what others will think, in particular, a judge. Who are you making photographs for: the judge, the audience, or yourself?